"The Pulse" -- #110 / JPM + GS Opened FT Apps + IPOs Are Different Today

Recruiting Timeline:

Banking:

Where We’re At:

• SA 2027: No new updates here—won’t see anything here until September

• SA 2026: No updates here. 105 firms are recruiting for SA 2026

• FT 2026: JPM, GS, Solomon Partners, and Burke Stelling Group opened their apps. 12 firms are actively recruiting for FT 2026  

• If you need some interview support or just need a place to vent, check out our Coaching Program: Coaching for banking, consulting, and buyside recruiting | The Pulse. 95%+ of those coached for the summer 2025 recruiting season received offers!

New SA 2026 Applications:

• None

New FT 2026 Applications:

• JPM: Largest bulge bracket bank (FT 2026)

• GS: Prestigious bulge bracket bank (FT 2026)

• Solomon Partners: National boutique (FT 2026)

• Burke Stelling Group: Atlanta-based M&A boutique (FT 2026)

See below to gain access to our premium database, updated weekly, which houses the application processes for over 300+ banks/consulting/buyside firms! Gain an edge over everyone else by not having to spend countless hours tracking applications and deadlines.

Consulting:

Where We’re At:

• Nothing new to report here. As more apps get released, make sure you’re applying early and often.

SA 2026 released apps:

• None

FT 2026 released apps:

• LEK - Associate Consultant

Buyside:

Where We’re At:

• SA 2026: No new updates. Currently 108 buyside firms are recruiting for SA 2026 seats 

New SA 2026 released apps:

• None

The database is updated weekly and contains 300+ Investment Banking and Consulting internships/full-time positions along with:

• Interview tips for specific companies

• Interview prep material

• Applications and deadlines linked so that you can apply with one click

• Insider information about the application process

• Professionals to network with

• Buyside deadlines, interview prep, and people to network with for the sweatiest of students

We send the updated dataset every week with the latest banking and consulting job postings. We released our 110th update today.

Students we have been helping have already landed roles at Blackstone, Goldman, J.P. Morgan, Jefferies, Citi, and Solomon.

To get access to the database and the weekly updates, you make a one-time investment of $65 Credit Card / Debit Card: (ThePulsePrep—Stripe.com) that grants you annual access to the updated database (please reach out for additional payment options). If you don’t find our services helpful, we simply ask for feedback on an area we can improve upon and will refund your $65.

This is a small investment for a huge payout when you secure your dream offer!

Premium Database——>Database for banking, consulting and buyside roles | The Pulse 

Market Update:

IPOs are Different Today

Believe it or not, 2025 is off to a decent IPO run. In the U.S., there have been over 166 IPOs to date —well on the way to the 300+ IPO prediction we made for 2025: "The Pulse" -- #84 / 2025 Deal Flow.

Markets have been volatile. However, the backlog of limited IPO volume over the last 3 years and a return to ATH has spurred greater IPO confidence from large, private businesses looking for liquidity.

Another interesting feature of 2025 IPOs is that they have been crushing performance:

Historically, IPOs haven’t been a great investment. They’re typically over-priced, over-hyped, and lack keen financial skepticism seen in the public markets.

This data only goes up to 2019, but 2020→ 2022 IPO performance was even worse.

What’s been going on? Why is the 2024 / 2025 IPO crop seemingly different than prior vintages?

It’s early to make this call, but these are companies that a). were priced conservatively, b). are more mature, and c). have stronger financial characteristics.

-Pricing-

IPOs today are underwritten at much more conservative pricing which naturally creates greater opportunity to realize upside after the shares are listed.

Banks are being cautious about investor appetite for these listings and are opting to underwrite these valuations at more conservative levels than the ZIRP era. For example, Chime recently IPO’d at an $11bn valuation, a huge mark down from its earlier Series G fundraise at a $25bn valuation.

-Maturity-

Companies IPO’ing today are more seasoned than ZIRP-era IPOs.

In 2025, companies going public are often over 10 years old. In the ZIRP-era, they were often less than 10 years old. Fundamentally, older companies have a more proven track record than younger companies and often carry a stronger financial profile (ie--positive FCF).

A huge help here is the reduction in SPAC activity.

2021 SPACs were full of immature companies with shitty financial profiles. SPAC investors were just dumping shit into the market because people were jumping at anything new. Companies such as Lordstown Motors and Nikola were SPAC’d shitcos that ultimately filed for Chapter 11. You’ll see that trend with plenty of other 2021 SPACs.

-Financial Profile-

Bundling points ‘a’ and ‘b’ together, IPOs today are generally more financially-sound companies. REAL PMF, REAL track records, REAL revenue, REAL FCF, and sometimes REAL profitability. EBIDTA margins for most IPOs are still on the lower side vs. more established players, but 2025 IPOs are showing margins that are multiples greater than what we saw in 2021.

Those are all metrics public markets investors value.

That’s the story of 2025 vs. the ZIRP-era. However, are investors still expecting the same hockey-stick growth from today’s ‘mature’ IPOs relative to prior vintages?

Are investors just happy that IPOs look better today without discounting the fact that these are just more mature businesses? The underlying bet on IPOs is that the growth engine will continue or improve over time, but that is often inversely correlated with established businesses.

This is more of a behavioral concern, but mature, cash-flowing businesses typically shift priorities from revenue growth at all costs to capital preservation and value harvesting via dividends. Applying the standard IPO investment considerations to this type of business would wildly over-index for a valuation built upon a growth story.

Disclosure: Nothing written here is financial advice or should be used for investment decisions.

Recruiting for FT IB vs. SA IB

FT IB recruiting is kicking up with interviews starting at a few shops across the Street.

The full-time process is opaque and nuanced, much different from the summer analyst recruiting process. Below I highlight the differences:

• Recruiting is ‘as-needed’ vs. ‘by design’

Around July, firms decide which interns are worth giving a return offer and which interns will be cut. They also start to size up year-end comp and budgets allowing them to determine if they need more heads on the team. These two factors determine how many full-time analysts will be brought onto the team. In one year, GS could open 100 full-time spots, in the next they may only open up 10 new spots.

Entirely different from internship programs where firms have a specific number they’re looking to hire. Regardless, it’s paramount to never put your eggs in one basket. Apply across the Street.

• You need to be a specialist, not a generalist

You will stand out for having a specific reason for working in M&A at [X] boutique vs. just wanting to work in investment banking. The more specific you are, the better your networking calls will be and the more visibility you’ll have into the recruiting process.

• Networking matters 10x more

Firms hire full-time analysts because they’re willing to take a bet that you’ll be a good employee for the next few years. They need to be certain that you’re a). easy to work with and b). able to do the work.

This is very different from internship recruiting where firms are only taking a bet for 9 weeks.

• Technicals will be harder

You’re expected to have a stronger financial background than you did when you recruited for intern positions. Also, firms need to see that you’re genuinely interested in the type of work you’ll be doing as a full-time analyst.

The technicals asked will be more along the lines of ‘Advanced’ or case-type questions to determine your ability to actually think through an answer instead of pure memorization.

• Experience matters more

Your ability to spin prior experience to sound like deal experience is critical. Firms need to know that you’re a process / systems-oriented thinker who is willing to invest time into a project to realize future success.

If you’re oblivious to how a transaction process works, than firms won’t want you. That’s not something they’re willing to teach a full-time employee.

Going Forward:

Recruiting for Buyside Associate Roles?

Peep our Buyside Associate Recruiting Platform: Buyside Recruiting & Interview Prep Platform | The Pulse

15+ Real Models / Case Studies with solutions + a database of jobs directly from headhunters. The Pulse gives IB analysts the access needed, plus the modeling prep to stand out.

Please reach out to us with any questions about recruiting or if you’re interested in meeting the team! ([email protected])

We are happy to chat, review resumes, or help set up a coaching session

Check us out on LinkedIn (The Pulse) and Instagram (ThePulse)

Proudly Produced,

The Pulse

“The Pulse” #110

Make sure you receive us every Sunday!

Everyone: reply to this email with a "Yo" or “hey” or “hell yeah”

Gmail mobile: Click the 3 dots (...) at the top right corner, then "Move," then "Primary" 

Gmail desktop: Go back to your inbox and move this email to the "Primary" tab

Other users: Follow these instructions